Standardized underwriting · Specialized analysis
Underwriting infrastructure for cases and alternative data assets.
LitCap delivers standardized, evidence-linked case underwriting and specialized analysis for alternative data assets—turning fragmented records into structured, decision-ready risk and value intelligence.
Standardized case underwriting
Specialized alternative asset analysis
LC
Version 1.2 · evidence reviewed 07/31
Capital request
$1.8M
Duration band
24–36 mo
Procedural stage
Post-MTD
Information state
Substantial
Separate attorney intake
Camp Lejeune Justice Act portfolio underwriting →For firms holding Camp Lejeune claims
Be ready to move when Track 1 concludes.
Firms with Camp Lejeune inventories do not need another statistic. They need a clean roster, completed underwriting, and a ranked case queue before individual-file preparation accelerates.
The timing of Track 1 is not yours to control. The readiness of your portfolio is.
Portfolio readiness sequence
Organize the roster
Deduplicate the inventory and establish a clean, complete operating list for every Camp Lejeune claim your firm holds.
Underwrite and rank
Classify each claim by viability, documentation state, curability, and priority so the strongest files rise first.
Prepare the individual cases
Give the team a claim-level work queue showing what is ready, what needs attention, and what should not absorb more time.
Result
A ranked, categorized portfolio your attorneys can work case by case.
The diligence bottleneck
The case may be the same. The diligence starts over with every funder.
Litigation opportunities arrive in inconsistent formats. Each capital provider reconstructs the merits, economics, duration, and recovery risks before deciding whether the case fits its mandate. LitCap performs that analysis through one consistent, automated methodology and makes the reasoning inspectable.
Pleadings & exhibits
Case package
Docket research
Public record
Budget & damages
Case package
Merits & defenses
Case record
Standardized output
One evidence-linked underwriting report
How it works
From case materials to a completed underwrite.
The workflow is fully automated. Each stage preserves the source trail so the final conclusion can be examined rather than simply accepted.
Assemble the record
Combine the public docket with the controlled case package supplied for review.
Analyze the risk
Evaluate merits, damages, collectability, duration, budget, counsel, and procedural exposure.
Standardize the findings
Apply consistent definitions, assumptions, information states, and an LC risk profile.
Deliver the underwrite
Return the conclusion, score, evidence trail, downside cases, and unresolved questions.
The underwriting report
A score you can interrogate.
Every LC profile includes what supports the conclusion, what cuts against it, where the information came from, and which assumptions remain exposed.
Information state
Illustrative interface · figures and conclusions shown for product demonstration only
Judicial intelligence
Know the bench—and the adversary—before you underwrite.
LitCap measures how judges handle the motions, timing, and authorities that matter to a case, then adds opposing-counsel and firm behavior. Every figure carries its source coverage and confidence.
Illustrative bench profile
District judge · commercial matters
Judicial tendencies
Motion-level behavior compared with the relevant district and circuit—not reported as a bare rate.
Timing by stage
Stage-level duration ranges that reflect the time horizon funders actually underwrite.
The full bench
District and magistrate practice, including referral behavior and the procedural path between them.
Reasoning & authority
What the judge credits in written decisions, with the underlying orders and opinions available as support.
Adversary profiles
Opposing counsel and firm practice: what they file, how often, and how matters tend to resolve.
How it is built
From the primary record, not reputation.
Dockets, orders, and opinions sit behind the analysis. Where the record is thin, LitCap shows the relevant baseline instead of inventing precision.
Judicial tendency is one input. Case merits are another.
Available inside a full diligence package for funders and plaintiff firms. Standalone requests can be discussed during an underwriting consultation.
Discuss judicial intelligenceThe LC standard
A common risk language for litigation.
Credit markets scale through consistent, comparable risk information. LitCap is building that underwriting layer for litigation—without asking funders to abandon their own mandates, pricing, or investment judgment.
- One methodology across cases
- Comparable factor definitions and information states
- Scores designed to be tested against resolved outcomes
| Matter | LC profile | Conclusion | Duration | Capital need |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial tort | LC 648 | Supported | 24–36 mo | $1.8M |
| Contract claim | LC 612 | Review | 18–30 mo | $950K |
| Patent matter | LC 571 | Conditional | 30–48 mo | $3.2M |
Illustrative comparison · same definitions · source-linked findings · versioned reports
For litigation funders
One underwriting layer. Two capital decisions.
Incoming opportunities
Underwrite before funding.
Receive a complete, standardized view of a case before committing internal diligence resources or capital.
- Single-case diligence
- Mandate-fit comparison
- Investment-committee report
Case portfolios
Allocate within a portfolio.
Compare matters within a mass-tort or law-firm inventory and determine where additional capital is supported by the underwriting.
- Cohort-level comparison
- Case prioritization
- Capital allocation
Underwriting consultation
Bring us a case. Get back an underwrite.
Start with one matter or a portfolio. We’ll discuss the case package, scope, and underwriting questions your team needs answered.
Prefer email?
cases@litcapmarket.com